From Conception...To Election

"Preventing an individual with plural loyalties, whether by biological, political or geographic origins, which may present lawful or perceptable doubt as to his allegiances thereof, other than one with the fullmost sovereignty of advanced citizenry, which is that of one who remains Natural-born from conception to election, from assuming the great power of this fragile office, was, without tolerance or vulnerability, the exaction of purpose of our fathers to induce the mandate of presidential eligibility upon our blood-ransomed Constitution..." Pen Johannson ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.

Thursday, February 5, 2009

Obama Vetting Failures Raise Ominous Questions

The disqualification of three Obama nominees has triggered the belated awareness of a sleepy mainstream media and revitalized America's requisition for legitimate answers to some longstanding, potentially apocalyptic, and menacing questions about the indentities and origins of those who have taken control of the U.S. Government.

Obama may not be able to proceed with the business of "remaking America" before he puts to rest the concerns the nation, and perhaps the world, has about the current processes and standards used to confirm and disclose the identities of America's most important leaders.

Regardless whether or not eligibility for public service is affirmed or denied by any available information, it is the height of irresponsibility to allow anyone to govern over the resources of free people without first providing commensurate cause for their confidence and understanding of that leader’s identity and precipitance of origin.

The ascendance of invisible, anonymous officials cannot be tolerated in a democracy if that democracy is expected to survive. For, it is in the very moment that phantoms become rulers that the seeds of tyranny are sown.

Throughout the year prior to the 2008 election, questions about the eligibility of candidates, from both political parties, ambled along the internet’s video cavalcade and blogosphere community. Based on “Google” search data reports, nearly 500 million people world-wide have searched for “non-mainstream media” material involving the illegitimacy of Obama, and his departmental and cabinet nominees.

After the third of five suspect Obama nominees withdraws from the appointment process, the malfunction of the Democrat’s vetting standards has triggered legitimate nation wide debate about the eligibility and fidelity of Obama personnel now assuming control of our government.

Apparently, now under the pressure of a rampaging 1 trillion ton gorilla, the mainstream media finds the issue worth paying attention to. Well, good morning, sunshine!!! We thought you were going to sleep through the entire election cycle.

So, let’s get caught up on a few things before your “Morning Joe”.

Your recently elected gorilla is moving ahead with extreme legislative prejudice. And, unfortunately, three cage mates escaped.

Hillary Clinton proceeded unabated into the State Department’s head job despite Obama knowing that her appointment would violate constitutional statutes governing salary limitations. Tim Geitner was stealthily, and ironically, installed by Obama as the “Head of Taxes” despite failing to meet his own legal obligations to remit taxes himself. Not surprisingly, Google records also show that searches of Tim Geitner’s situation was summarily followed by the most massive use of the chat ellipsis, “WTF?” in internet history.

But, perhaps most egregiously, Barrack Obama, himself, was crowned president by the dysfunctional vigor of oblivious, hate-driven, electoral drones despite a fathomless abyss of questions about everything ranging from his constitutional eligibility, citizenship, natural born status, immigration records, legal name, racial origins to educational aid recipient records.

It is important that America understands that none of the questions about the aforementioned personnel currently serving in the U.S. government have ever been thoroughly addressed to the satisfaction of the American public or cleared by ANY publicly disclosed, federally standardized, vetting procedure. Not one.

Fortunately, it appears the damage of political impropriety, and its consequential threat to the honcho in charge, has taken precedence over the importance of simply following the basic principles of our Constitution in the first place. Some of the suspected degenerates were asked to step aside before their misconduct had destructive ramifications to bigger-wigs.

Bill Richardson withdrew from nomination to the Department of Commerce because of alleged contractural impropriety as governor of New Mexico. Learning a lesson from the Geitner fiasco, Tom Daschle and Nancy Killefer were asked to withdraw their names after their respective candidacies were disqualified when it was discovered they also failed the tax test.

As the dominoes begin to fall, it was also recently reported that Charlie Rangle, (D) New York, is being investigated for failing to correctly report nearly $239,000 in assets.

And, it goes on and on.

So, why is the media paying attention now? Why are these developments of governmental impropriety suddenly reportable while the prior cries for help by the American people were ignored as despots were given a pass?

Well, first of all, we obviously need a better reporting system. Until now, the media, amidst its own politically-driven moral desolation, has completely failed to acknowledge the legitimate discussion about these violations of eligibility standards and disregard for securities laws on the part of Obama’s administration. And, the entire media establishment should be ashamed of its blatant and despicable dereliction.

Of course, we all know the matter has been totally ignored by the liberal media broadcast organizations. This is expected. But, this “black out” is also due in large part to failure by what have traditionally been considered as balanced cable media outlets. Fox News, the “Fair And Balanced” network intentionally fumbled the Obama eligibility story out of a cowardly fear of being labeled by leftist fanatics as “loony” by association.

Apparently, the media’s angle secure, it now appears the appointment of ineligible high ranking officials is not only a possibility, it’s a fact based certainty. Now, despite the previous deafening silence from the media, the issue has suddenly galvanized into legitimate discourse throughout mainstream America.

But, now its too late. America prefers “You-Tube” and “The Daily Pen” over “The O’reilly Factor” and “The Wall Street Journal.”

So, now that the rest of the media complex has been slapped across their oblivious faces, we can finally all choose, collectively, to be aware of this malfeasance. And, in doing so we will ask the manifest questions commensurate to our revelations.

Just exactly what are the standards of eligibility for public service in the United States Government?

More importantly, do we even know if those with power over our worth as a tax paying nation currently meet the minimum requirements for a position to serve us?

Apparently, no one on planet earth is willing to say. Either they don't know, don't show or don't care about what's going on in this Godforsaken zoo.

No comments:

Post a Comment